Author Topic: Motion Based  (Read 5621 times)

colprit

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Motion Based
« on: April 19, 2006, 08:26:41 AM »
With my Forerunner 205 came the option of using Motion Based Lite for free. I decided to check it out so I uploaded 4 courses I had run.

All the courses pace and distance were way off. The elevation seemed fairly accurate. Their maps suck, not impressive at all. Their site was incredibly slow, like I have all day to analyze the information on my runs ':angry:'

I honestly can't believe people would use Motion Based if they knew they have an option. I know I will not waste my time with it.

Thanks for developing TF. '<img'>

Dean

Krein

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1203
  • TopoFusion Author
    • View Profile
    • http://www.topofusion.com/diary
Motion Based
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2006, 03:42:12 PM »
Funny that you mention this.  The MB team tried to hire one of our developers (with an out of the blue job offer).

One of the reasons we weren't interested is that we didn't find most of what they are doing to be very interesting or useful.  I agree about the slow load times and poor maps.  It's all about the maps, graphics and fast response time.

They are accomplishing one thing, though, and that's collecting a massive database of GPS tracks -- whether voluntarily or not.  They are "mapping the world" -- but right now they do almost nothing with all the data.

Of course, Motion Based is owned by Garmin, so it's no surprise that each unit has an "invitation" to check out their own software.

The guys are MB are a good crew, actually.  They're just doing things differently than we do.  And in my eyes we don't really compete (much) with them.