1
TopoFusion Pro / Re: Correct Map Offset
« on: March 11, 2010, 11:11:20 AM »
South Dakota fell off the map in a lot of other ways 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
TopoFusion Pro / Re: Correct Map Offset
« on: March 11, 2010, 10:57:06 AM »
I get the "unable to display" tileset with the color tileset, but I know it used to show up when it was first introduced. In fact, it isn't even showing up in the available tilesets and I'm using Version 3.97
3
TopoFusion Pro / Re: Correct Map Offset
« on: March 11, 2010, 10:38:10 AM »
Maybe in the next update you can allow users to create their own presets. I don't believe we need "big Brother's" permission.
Custer South Dakota
All Aerial
x offset = 10
y offset = 8
Wish I could use the urban maps here.
Custer South Dakota
All Aerial
x offset = 10
y offset = 8
Wish I could use the urban maps here.
4
TopoFusion Pro / Correct Map Offset
« on: March 11, 2010, 08:28:10 AM »
How do I enter a new preset for the Correct Map Offset feature. Currently there is Tucson Mountain Park and Colorado Springs but apparently no way to enter an new one.
5
TopoFusion Pro / Topofusion 3.41
« on: August 22, 2008, 06:49:16 AM »
From the properties window, it seems to be adding a waypoint instead of editing it.
6
TopoFusion Pro / Topofusion 3.41
« on: August 22, 2008, 06:36:57 AM »
From the File Properties window, Right Click on the Waypoint, choose edit, Under name, change the name, i.e. from 7.00 mi to 6.30 mi....... Although I go through the process, it doesn't change, it stays 7.00 mi.
If I Right Click on the waypoint on the map, it seems to work.
If I Right Click on the waypoint on the map, it seems to work.
7
TopoFusion Pro / Topofusion 3.41
« on: August 21, 2008, 09:32:18 PM »
I updated to Topofusion 3.41 and found the new version won't let me edit the waypoints. 
'>
'>
8
TopoFusion Pro / Topofusion 3.8
« on: July 12, 2008, 01:34:05 PM »
I just downloaded Topofusion 3.38..... Love the arrows, thanks.
Dean
Dean
9
TopoFusion Pro / Elevation Server Error
« on: June 29, 2008, 03:30:12 PM »
Thanks. Since the server must have gone down during my transfer to Vista, I wasn't sure if it was an OS problem.
Forgot to mention: When I do select "correct elevations", the tile switches to Land Sat, which is annoying. Can this be fixed?
Forgot to mention: When I do select "correct elevations", the tile switches to Land Sat, which is annoying. Can this be fixed?
10
TopoFusion Pro / Elevation Server Error
« on: June 29, 2008, 03:22:25 PM »
I recently switched to a new computer running Vista. I'm getting an error message concerning the elevation server.
When I select "Correct Elevations" in the Run Analysis, an error message comes up saying "Could not connect to the elevation server, it may be busy, try again later".
Any ideas on this?
When I select "Correct Elevations" in the Run Analysis, an error message comes up saying "Could not connect to the elevation server, it may be busy, try again later".
Any ideas on this?
11
Archived - Feedback and Comments / SportTracks
« on: April 30, 2006, 09:03:10 AM »
I spent some time checking out SportTracks http://www.zonefivesoftware.com/SportTracks/index.html
In this program, you can choose to view the same maps as in TopoFusion, but also you can choose "World Maps" which are Google maps. So why is it this can't be implemented into TopoFusion? Just curious!
In this program, you can choose to view the same maps as in TopoFusion, but also you can choose "World Maps" which are Google maps. So why is it this can't be implemented into TopoFusion? Just curious!
12
Archived Support / Grade & Climbing elevation excessive
« on: April 23, 2006, 04:37:34 PM »
Actually, following the download is just a cheap thrill 
'>
'>
13
Archived Support / Grade & Climbing elevation excessive
« on: April 22, 2006, 07:58:55 AM »
With the Forerunner 205, I'm noticing the grade and climbing elevations seem to be excessive. On one of my courses, with the 201 it indicated an uphill grade of 5.5%, the 205 indicates a grade of 14.0%. The 5.5% grade is more believeable.
Same course, the 201 shows a climbing elevation of 426 ft and the 205 shows 716 ft.
ALSO... When downloading from the 205, the "follow download in map" doesn't work.
Same course, the 201 shows a climbing elevation of 426 ft and the 205 shows 716 ft.
ALSO... When downloading from the 205, the "follow download in map" doesn't work.
14
Archived - Feedback and Comments / Motion Based
« on: April 19, 2006, 08:26:41 AM »
With my Forerunner 205 came the option of using Motion Based Lite for free. I decided to check it out so I uploaded 4 courses I had run.
All the courses pace and distance were way off. The elevation seemed fairly accurate. Their maps suck, not impressive at all. Their site was incredibly slow, like I have all day to analyze the information on my runs
I honestly can't believe people would use Motion Based if they knew they have an option. I know I will not waste my time with it.
Thanks for developing TF.
'>
Dean
All the courses pace and distance were way off. The elevation seemed fairly accurate. Their maps suck, not impressive at all. Their site was incredibly slow, like I have all day to analyze the information on my runs
I honestly can't believe people would use Motion Based if they knew they have an option. I know I will not waste my time with it.
Thanks for developing TF.
'> Dean
15
Archived Support / Garmin 305 Data transfer problem
« on: April 17, 2006, 08:11:17 PM »
I am using the 205. Unlike the 201, I found you need to reset the 205 before you can transfer the data, otherwise it says the memory is empty.
Hope this helps.
Dean
Hope this helps.
Dean
16
Archived - Feedback and Comments / google maps
« on: April 14, 2006, 08:33:30 PM »
This topic has been mentioned before, but I too would like to see newer map data available in TF.
Is there a possibility of this?
Dean
Is there a possibility of this?
Dean
17
Archived Support / Forerunner 205 & TF
« on: April 14, 2006, 06:19:47 PM »
I received my Forerunner 205 last Monday and have been running with it all week. The signal is so much better than the 201 ever was. I even have a signal inside my house.
When I first uploaded the info from the Forerunner 205 to TF, It said the memory was empty. This is when I realized you need to hit the reset button first. Once doing this the info uploaded very quickly.
When comparing the 205 track to a previous track using the 201, I was really impressed with how smooth it was, not zagged like the 201 alway was. I had the 205 set to post a track point every second. The points exactly followed the path I ran, even when I moved to the far side of the path or road due to traffic, it showed exactly on the map. Awesome!
If you are questioning whether you can justify upgrading to the Forerunner 205 or 305, just do it, you won't be sorry.
Dean
When I first uploaded the info from the Forerunner 205 to TF, It said the memory was empty. This is when I realized you need to hit the reset button first. Once doing this the info uploaded very quickly.
When comparing the 205 track to a previous track using the 201, I was really impressed with how smooth it was, not zagged like the 201 alway was. I had the 205 set to post a track point every second. The points exactly followed the path I ran, even when I moved to the far side of the path or road due to traffic, it showed exactly on the map. Awesome!
If you are questioning whether you can justify upgrading to the Forerunner 205 or 305, just do it, you won't be sorry.
Dean
18
Archived Support / new to program and mapping
« on: March 23, 2005, 09:01:15 PM »
Use the Goto menu, type in
32.89955 n
105.96025 w
Use the topo or aerial maps. You must be connected to the internet for the maps to download.
32.89955 n
105.96025 w
Use the topo or aerial maps. You must be connected to the internet for the maps to download.
19
Archived Support / map information
« on: March 17, 2005, 07:40:34 PM »
Is there an easy way in TopoFusion to find out information on the maps displayed?
On the TerraServer site, I found the aerial maps of my area were captured 9/3/1998
On the TerraServer site, I found the aerial maps of my area were captured 9/3/1998
20
Archived Support / GPS Communications Screen
« on: March 17, 2005, 08:16:37 AM »
Thank for the quick reply. BTW, TopoFusion is great, I look forward to traveling with it.
21
Archived Support / GPS Communications Screen
« on: March 17, 2005, 08:07:59 AM »
The online manual shows the GPS communications screen with 3 choices; merge active log to single track, download saved tracks and merge saved tracks + active log to single track. I only get two options; follow download in map and add tracks to logbook. Why?
Also, is there a way to just download the active log?
Also, is there a way to just download the active log?
Pages: [1]