Author Topic: Arizona Trails  (Read 5537 times)

wayne

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 65
    • View Profile
Arizona Trails
« on: June 22, 2009, 07:10:04 PM »
This isn't as exciting or useful as the other posts, but I do have some good examples of Topofusion use.

Here is the method I used, whether driving, riding, or hiking:

I start with GPS track logs (recording one point every 10 feet)
•  Sometimes use another program to make some manual cleaning--clip off unwanted trails recording before trails, etc.
• Made little "x" on the end of trails to ensure they average.
• Re-save tracks as GPX.

Opened the GPX in TopoFusion and used the Network function to automatically:
• Average tracks where I used the same road/trail more than once
• Remove stubs where I pulled down a road/trail for a second then got back on.

One example:  A GPX file reduced from 1.3 meg (11,000 points) to 1.1 meg (7,300 points) and made multiple-track roads more accurate due to averaging.  But I want to go smaller so I have room for more tracks on the GPS.

I then used the Simplify function where you can specify how many final points to have.

Offroad 4x4 Take original track and (% of original track points)
• Div by 9 (11%) General track.  Use when memory is at a premium or you don't need a perfect map.
• Div by 7 (14%) good on curvy mountain roads, overall pretty good representation for high zoom (Zoom 15 in DeLorme Topo).  You won't get lost.
• Div by 5 (20%) virtually indistinguishable from original tracks at zoom 15, during 'regular' dirt roads.  Is great on switchbacks.  When going to zoom 16 and 17, it's still very good.

Offroad Hiking/Mountain Biking  Take original track and (% of original track points)
If there aren't a lot of side trails you can use the greater reductions above.  If there's a lot of trails, you may want greater resolution to more quickly determine if the correct fork in the trail.
• Div by 3 (33%) and the file is nearly indistinguishable from the original even at the highest zooms.
• Divide by 2 (50%) and it's essentially perfect.  This gives one point about every 20 feet but intelligently reduced to give more points on curves, less on straights.  I would question using this resolution, however.  It's "compulsive-attentive" level of logging (unless you count not reducing track sizes at all).

I then saved the new GPX file, imported back to Topo, applied colors, thickness, and notes.

• I rode (mountain bike) most of the Tucson Mountain park and used/combined those trails.  The files are in DeLorme Topo format here:
http://forum.delorme.com/viewtopic.php?t=15943

• I hiked/rode all around the Grand Canyon / Little Grand Canyon area.  Those files are in DeLorme Topo format here:
http://forum.delorme.com/viewtopic.php?t=9278

I wanted to put up another example of how I use Topofusion.  I'm not good with all the other features and am slowly learning more.  The track average and track reduction are really the sole reason I bought the program, and they work great.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2013, 12:50:28 PM by wayne »

wayne

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 65
    • View Profile
Re: Arizona Trails
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2009, 02:43:07 PM »
Topofusion has actually changed the way I hike/bike. 

I now make an effort to wander to both sides of the tail now and then when I hike to ensure my recorded track logs cross each other to ensure good averaging. 

When I see a new road I want to explore later, I make certain I go at least 30 feet down the road so the setting I use in TopoFusion's stub reduction doesn't eliminate it.